Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > There's another reason to do that. '1' is a common constants. > > 0x31313131 is not. I like to > > make important constants have complex values that can be caught from > > (e.g.) a JTAG memory dump. > > What about 0x4c415232 instead? That's "LAR2". > > > >> Can we use some magic other than "ORBC"? > > > > I don't see the problem, but I'll take a suggestion.
Let's start with working out the name. :) //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
