> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Stefan Reinauer <ste...@coresystems.de> > wrote: >> Peter Stuge wrote: >>> Is someone owning this issue? >>> >>> >> Yes, Jordan wrote the code, he should decide. That's how we handled such >> cases before. >> >> Stefan >> > > Jordan, don't know if you saw the discussion, one possibility was to > change to cbfs (coreboot fs) > > ron
Normally, I wouldn't want to make a unilateral decision like this - I'm not in the community any longer, and you guys have to live with the name. But in this case, I honestly think that that the romfs concept is essential to the long term health of the project, and I don't want to derail it over something silly like a name. Lets go with cbfs. Jordan -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
