Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Right now, flashrom assumes that if a coreboot table exists, the > board NEEDS a board specific enable function. If there is none > (because it is not needed), flashrom will complain. > > Three options are available to solve this: > 1. Leave the code as-is and confuse developers and users alike. > 2. Add info to the coreboot table that the board doesn't need any > special flash enabling. > 3. Provide dummy functions for every board supported by coreboot.
4. Remove the table lookup completely. 5. Make flashrom continue silently instead of complaining. I prefer either of 4 or 5 over 1-3. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
