On 14.04.2009 03:29, Richard Smith wrote: > Peter Stuge wrote: >> ron minnich wrote: >>> did you test with abuild :-) >> >> No sir. I have neither procedure nor CPU power for abuild. :\ >> >> By the time I would have managed to run abuild once, the server would >> probably have run abuild thrice, including the two potential rounds >> of fixes. > > Something I've always wondered about is why is abuild only in response > to a svn commit? I think it would be quite handy if you had something > like abuild-v[[email protected] and any patch you send as an attachment > to it pulls a copy of the tree applies the patch and then runs abuild > on the tree and then emails back the results.
Security reasons? What's stopping anyone from mailing a patch which starts a shell on the abuild server which listens on port 12345 or similar fun? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
