On 22.04.2009 22:50 Uhr, ron minnich wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Joseph Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> This really sounds like an unitialized variable or a bad pointer. >>> >>> >> Wouldn't gcc catch these and error when building? >> > > > not always. that's what sparse can be useful for. > > ron > >
BTW: I did a new scanbuild run today: http://www.coresystems.de/~stepan/coreboot-scanbuild/ Patches and bug fixes are welcome. If anyone succeeds to get sparse running with coreboot, i'll give it a try, too. It didn't work all too well when i tried. Stefan -- coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613 Email: [email protected] • http://www.coresystems.de/ Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656 Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
