Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > AFAIK %p already prints the 0x before the hex value, so buf=%p would be > preferable.
Yes, I made a mistake. Maybe the C library on his system is reponsible for the no "0x" output? http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-May/047736.html > Other than that, I think the patch improves readability and is > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> Thank you. > Do you have commit access or do you want me to commit with the small 0x > change? No, I don't have commit access. Please commit for me. Thanks. yu ning -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
