On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 13.05.2009 14:20, schrieb Myles Watson: >> >> Can you move the declaration of high_rsdp too? One less #if. > > high_table_end changes in the meantime. I could store it somewhere else, but > I'm not sure if that's a cleaner solution
Yep. >> I don't see how this changes the functionality. Which variable are you >> worried about? Sorry if I'm being blind. > > - unsigned long rsdt_location=(unsigned > long*)(((acpi_rsdp_t*)high_rsdp)->rsdt_address); > > high_rsdp->rsdt_address is filled in by write_acpi_table(). Acked-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]> Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
