bifferos wrote: > Somebody's getting their memory ranges muddled up. Patrick, in r95 you're using a type member in struct memrange (itself a member of libpayload sysinfo_t) but the type member only exists in the coreboot table, not in libpayload's sysinfo_t.memrange.
What is the good fix? Add the type member to libpayload sysinfo_t.memrange, work with coreboot tables directly or ignore everything but than CB_MEM_RAM when copying entires from coreboot table into sysinfo_t.memrange, making the changes in r95 no longer neccessary? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
