On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:19:56AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > Cool, thanks for testing, i guess we can change NT to OK in the > chipset_enable.
Yes. > About the "Bad board" list. A bad board is not like lepracy from before > medicine advanced enough. When a board is added, it is not banished to > some forsaken island to rot for the rest of its life. It is added to the Sure. > known bad list in part to warn users and in part to spur developers on > to do something about it. So we need to require an email address before > adding a board to this list. It shouldn't be strictly required, though it's definately recommended, yes. For instance, I've seen flashrom logs (-r, -wv, -E, etc) together with their output on some blogs, wikis, mailing lists etc. which are sometimes enough to tell if the board is working OK or not (e.g. requires chipset-enable or board-enable). For these external "scraped" pages we might not be able to find an email address, but it's still useful to add such a tested non-working board to our list until some user shows up in IRC/ML and helps us supporting the board. But yes, in general, we should record who tested a certain board as OK/BAD, if possible with email address. > I think the only reasonable thing to do is to: > * mark the a7n8x deluxe as tested ok. > * remove the a7n8x-e deluxe from the known bad list, but not add it as > tested ok. That's fine, yes. Removing it from the BAD list is ok, but we should not add it to the OK list, indeed. Please feel free to commit. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
