On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:32:57PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 14.06.2009 22:37, Uwe Hermann wrote: > > Add support for the PMC Pm29F002T/B chips. > > > > I sucessfully tested all operations on a Pm29F002T chip. The Pm29F002B is > > untested but I assume it should also work. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[email protected]> > > > > I didn't find timing info in the datasheet after quick glace. Also, > > the 8192 is pretty arbitrary as we only do byte-wise programming on > > this chip. > > > > page_size usually is the eraseblock size. Please find out the eraseblock > size and fill it in. Thanks. > > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>
Thanks, r590. There's no uniform erase block size I think, there are the following erase blocks: Boot Block 16 Kbytes 00000h-03FFFh Parameter Block 1 8 Kbytes 04000h-05FFFh Parameter Block 2 8 Kbytes 06000h-07FFFh Main Block 1 96 Kbytes 08000h-1FFFFh Main Block 2 128 Kbytes 20000h-3FFFFh So the 8192 size is probably the best fit until flashrom can handle non-uniform sectors/blocks, dunno. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
