Hi Maximilian, On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 06:11:55PM +0200, Maximilian Thuermer wrote: > Yes, this is exactly the behaviour it is supposed to show. Also, you put > the function call in the right place. An observation we made with our C2 > Opterons is that the microcode patch led the system to resets of unknown > origin. As a matter of fact, our machine kept on resetting at the exact > same spot as yours. Try uncommenting the entry in the microcode lookup > table and see how far your code gets. The rather akward output of what > seems to be multiple cores writing to the serial console at the same time > has been discussed in other threads afaik and remains an issue to be > solved. Up until know, it did not keep our systems from booting and only > seems to be a temporary effect.
Yep, confirmed. With Marc's latest patch and the microcode disabled I get all the way to the payload (of course there is the multi-core talking problem, as well as the relatively slow memory init) where it hangs: http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dmr/fam10/h8dmr-ao.cap Hmm. I guess I'll need to dig a bit deeper there. Thanks! Ward. -- Ward Vandewege <[email protected]> Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
