On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Harrison, Jon (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: > Received and understood, then the basic issue is that at this point my > coreboot build is still broken and will not boot, so there are no > tables. (I had not realised the tables were read from RAM rather than > the ROM image) > > The upshot is that the flashrom ids are required to allow development > from the original bios.... for the time being. > > Once the build is booting properly and flashrom can autodetect I will > remove the ids. In the mean time I'm hoping that having this early > flashrom support will help others to help in the effort for the > CN400/epia-n(l)/Luke. > > If this is still all to immature for general release then fair enough, > it can wait until things are working better. > > Thanks, > Jon
No, this is reasonable, i will add an extra comment and commit. Plus, i think that we need to track down some badly filled out boards, pciid wise, so that we can change behaviour around the ids a bit. Make it a bit tighter: * require 2 main ids, always. * don't allow -m when a valid subsystem id is there. But that's a discussion for some other time, and anyway, it has a rather tough prerequisite. Luc Verhaegen. -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
