On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:49:55PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > The akefile rules for %.o and flashrom.o are identical. Let %.o handle > flashrom.o as well. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> > > Index: flashrom-makefile_cleanup/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- flashrom-makefile_cleanup/Makefile (Revision 624) > +++ flashrom-makefile_cleanup/Makefile (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -70,11 +70,8 @@ > > FEATURE_LIBS = $(shell LANG=C grep -q "FTDISUPPORT := yes" .features && > printf "%s" "-lftdi") > > -flashrom.o: flashrom.c .features > - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< $(SVNDEF) > - > %.o: %.c .features > - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ $(SVNDEF) > + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CFLAGS) $(SVNDEF) -o $@ -c $< > > clean: > rm -f $(PROGRAM) *.o
Ah, more simple flashrom things that even i understand... Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> Why am i seeing your patches double in your emails? Np for small ones, but for a big patch, seeing it double might be confusing. Luc Verhaegen. -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
