Myles Watson wrote: > > With only on/off, yes, it has to be handled in device-specific code. > > We also have not present fwiw.
Ok. > > Would it make sense to express/expose all different actions in the > > board configuration? > > I don't know which ones. It doesn't seem like a very common case. Yeah, you're right. Typically everything should be enabled and up. Motivation would be more to make exceptions easy and clear. > > It was there in the v3 dts, just not > > standardized. > > Wasn't it handled by the device-specific code based on integer > values passed from the dts? Right, but it was still moved to board configuration, which forced code to become a bit more general. I liked that. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
