On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:46 AM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Myles Watson<[email protected]> wrote: > > I had always misunderstood failover. I thought it was the last resort if > > normal & fallback didn't work. It actually is just a minimal image that > > chooses whether to run normal or fallback. > > that's why I never liked the name :-) > It's confusing. One of these days we'll have to change the name of cache_as_ram_auto.c and failover.c at the same time. > Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <[email protected]> > Rev 4427. Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
