Thank you all for your help. The demo is tomorrow and i couldn't get it
running. Tried everything but coreboot_ram.o wouldn't link.
To your suggestions:
- To measure direct in the payload is not really acceptable, cause you
have to change every payload and for my concept you have to measure every
possible payload which could come
- Another library with SHA-2 family is hard too find and I can't use
any untrusted or unmaintained code in my thesis, but thanks for that.
Hopefully in future, it will be easier to link foreign packages in Coreboot.
Regards,
René
2009/7/27 ron minnich <[email protected]>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Reinauer<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On 7/27/09 5:22 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> >> This is interesting, it's the second note today speculating that we
> >> need to compile with -lgcc.
> >>
> >
> > Which is especially weird since we link against libgcc already.
>
> ow. I have not been paying attention again. I thought we did the
> nostdlibs thing. Sorry.
>
> > Yes, we should drop libgcc linking, but x86emu wants it for the 64bit
> > division, too..
>
> oops. Missed that.
> ron
>
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
