On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 08:27 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Cristi > Magherusan<[email protected]> wrote: > > > There are a few approaches for fixing this, like: > > -link against libgcc (statically) > > Won't work on FC11. > > From a note on 9fans: > > ============= > also, i discovered something new today: > > "... decided to link everything dynamically. To enforce this (allmost) > all static libraries are removed (or not even build)..." > > $ gcc t.c -static > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > ============== > > > > -implement the needed functions ourselves (copied from libgcc) > > I vote for this one. Every time we count on stable (or even sane) > behavior from all linux distros or gnu toolchain, we get burned. I > think we need to be as standalone as possible. > > There are, what, four functions at issue? > > What really amazes me is that with all the inlining that is done > nowadays, these trivial functions are not inlined! > > ron > Hello,
This issue will be decided and fixed in time, maybe even cleaner, but now we need to have as much boards as possible work with kconfig/Kbuild and the workaround I submitted makes it possible, not to mention it was already done the same way in the older buildsystem. Cristi -- Ing. Cristi Măgherușan, System/Network Engineer Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania http://cc.utcluj.ro +40264 401247
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
