On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:35:57AM -0600, Marc Jones wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >> we have been discussing to drop the PowerPC port completely if > >> nobody is willing to step up and revive it. Comments? > > > > The old revs will still be there. > > > > In a way I think this is fine for all boards. Unless someone does the > > work to update soon, there's no point in keeping broken ports around. > > > > > > //Peter > > I agree,
Ditto. For PowerPC and ARM and MIPS u-boot and other bootloaders are better suited and already work and are maintained etc... > We should probably try to have a "last known working version" > in the supported boards list on the wiki. Hm, dunno, if the boards are removed from svn we could also remove them from the wiki table completely (or put them in a "supported in earlier revisions" table somewhere else, in case somebody may want to resurrect them). Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
