On 27.09.2009 16:38, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>>> I'm worried about any libgcc compiled with regparm!=0, but for now >>>> this >>>> patch improves the situation. >>> >>> libgcc uses the default calling convention. >> Is there an attribute to say "this function uses the default calling >> convention no matter what CFLAGS we have right now"? > > Sure, and you're already using that: the default on i386 is regparm=0.
What happens to libgcc if someone compiles gcc with regparm=3? Will libgcc still be compiled with regparm=0? (Disclaimer: I'm not a Gentoo user and won't try that.) Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
