On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Uwe Hermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just for the record -- I will violently NACK any patches which remove > boards for the sole reason of "long dead", "old board", "vendor died", > or similar reasons. ok. That said, if there is a board that might hold up progress because it is very odd in some way, then it is a candiidate for removal. I mainly started on the PPC because we have not had a maintainer in years, and we have not had a tester in over 5 years. And I keep getting warnings that they don't build. > > This is pretty much the only exception as it's a PowerPC board and we > should indeed drop those, u-boot and others are way better suited > for this stuff. yes. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
