On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 06.10.2009, 13:52 -0600 schrieb Myles Watson: >> I don't think we should have two copies of the device tree. I removed >> the second copy in Tyan s289x boards. I also removed rom_address >> statements that were pre-CBFS. Abuild tested. > I think the original idea why this wasn't done is to allow sconfig to > develop from there. I'm letting my ignorance show again. I don't know anything about sconfig.
> But I hope we'll get this switch done quick enough > that sconfig changes can wait until newconfig is gone... That would be nice. >> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> Rev 4727. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
