Myles Watson wrote: > >> Absolutely agreed. I think there will have to be another variable > >> like HAS_ACPI_SUPPORT for that to happen. > > > > How about simply ACPI? > > I think HAVE_ACPI_TABLES should become GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES
I like that! > and HAVE_ACPI_TABLES should take that new meaning. ACPI isn't > specific enough to see what it does without looking elsewhere. All right. By the way - maybe we too should store big static tables in cbfs? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
