On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote:
> But no matter what we decide on, it's got to be regular. The coreboot > tree isn't (due to newconfig's flexibility - I have no idea why this was > ever considered a good idea) it's history and compromise. I realize we have all reasons to dislike the newconfig tool, but don't be too hard on us ...we were not totally sure at the time what we were doing :-) ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
