On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:59 AM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > So I guess the question is how should we make sure the stack and heap >> > are >> > sized correctly. Using malloc to allocate the memory for lzma makes >> > sense, >> > but it is used in CAR too, so that complicates our decision. >> >> lzma decompressor gets a void * from the caller. Caller, if CAR, uses >> on-stack pointer. RAM code can, if desired, >> use malloc'ed memory? > > Not for the scratchpad. It's allocated on the stack of the ulzma function.
yes, but I always felt that was fixable. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
