On Oct 16, 2009, at 0:33, Uwe Hermann <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:01:12PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
config HAVE_ACPI_TABLES
bool
+ help
+ This variable specifies whether a given board has ACPI table
support.
+ It is usually set in mainboard/*/Kconfig.
+ Whether or not the ACPI tables are actually generated by
coreboot
+ is configurable by the user via GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES.
I think comments, not help text is the correct place to put
comments about
CONFIG variables that will never show up in a menu.
I started doing just that recently, but Peter mentioned it may
be a good idea to keep them as "help" texts so we can maybe
auto-generate documentation (for wiki or whatever) out of them easily
(Doxygen-like). Post is at:
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-October/052966.html
I'm not sure what to do, both methods have their advantages. What do
others think?
I think we already have doxygen to create doxygen like documentation
so we should be careful to introduce the need for another set of
tools. But whatever serves the cause best ...
Maybe some of it should just go into documentation/.
Hm, manually maintaining it will very likely fail and we'll have a
bit-rotting document very soon (like most of the other documents we
have right now). Keeping the help text near the variable (just as we
keep Doxygen-style code comments near the function they document) is a
good idea, IHMO. If we want an extra document with all config options
we should write up some scripts to generate that, as is done with
the oldconfig ones, see:
http://www.coreboot.org/Coreboot_Options
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.randomprojects.org
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
