On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Something like that would be fine with me, but since we'd do it just to > do > > it, not to make the code cleaner, maybe it's just as good to put the > > prototypes by the functions. > > In the case of that function you need a proto outside the file anyway. > > Having to put a proto next to a function makes the whole thing seem > kind of pointless :-) > Agreed. I don't like the missing prototype warning. Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
