> > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > >> > As opposed to our previous discussion, I think in this case your second > patch is nicer in this case, as these functions must never be called > directly but only through our gcc workaround wrapper. > I agree.
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]> > Rev 4888. Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
