Myles Watson wrote: > These three patches get rid of a few more warnings for me. > > abuild tested. > > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <[email protected]> > PS. It looks like part of the reason we have so many warnings is > the misuse of #define __ROMCC__ to mean "early code before the > device tree is available" __ROMCC__ is also used to get rid of > prototypes because romcc doesn't support them. What's the right > thing to do here? Maybe we should split the meanings so that we > test for __GNUC__ when we mean "not romcc", and we test for > __ROMCC__ (renamed, of course, later) when we mean early init? I'd like __ROMCC__ to stay, but I agree very much with a new #define BEFOREDEVICETREE or somesuch. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
