ron minnich wrote: > well how about this as a first step. We're getting exception 6. What > is that again? > Also: is 0x8e41a854 even remotely valid as a bios int? > And: 8831:eb60 -- 96E70 -- is that a sensible place for the CPU to be? > > It looks to me like the stack is somewhere odd: 774a. Is that right? > Where does the stack start out? > Finally ... as pointed out, if the VGA bios uses services that > coreboot does not supply, it's not going to work. Some of these VGA > bioses are very badly written, and this problem can occur. > All those values look pretty far off.. Mansoor, you could enable instruction level logging in YABEL and see where it stops looking sane..
Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
