Hi, On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:14:06PM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > > + int16_t magic; > > > > This can be uint16_t right? Or is there some reason to make it signed > > explicitly? > > There is no need for it to be signed. Unsigned makes more sense actually.
Fixed. Patch comitted in r4931, thanks! I also updated the wiki and linked to your sample dump there. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.randomprojects.org http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
