On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 12.11.2009 15:56, schrieb Myles Watson: >>> >>> Reverting everthing would be overkill.. The only thing that negatively >>> affects the build is the ROMBASE configuration in src/arch/i386/Kconfig, >>> the >>> other parts are fine. >>> >>> I'm looking for a way to keep ROMBASE functional that way (esp. to allow >>> smaller bootblocks) while fixing the current issue. >>> >> >> I think we should allow larger boot blocks at the same time and fix >> fam10 builds. >> > > If that fixes fam10, I'm all for it. My understanding is that failover was > invented specifically to make fam10 work with only 64kb of available ROM, > but I might be wrong. That would mean that a bootblock >64kb wouldn't be > entirely visible. I keep forgetting that the bootblock has to be < 64Kb so that the start is reachable with a jump in 16-bit mode. A larger bootblock makes it build but fails to boot.
>> It's up to you. Reverting it seems cheap compared to having it broken >> for multiple days. >> > > Either I fix it today, or I'll revert that part of the change. Either way > it'll work in a couple of hours again. Great. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
