Patrick Georgi escribió: > Am 01.02.2010 13:28, schrieb Patrick Georgi: > >> So there really is some difference at least in the ram stages of >> fallback and normal. For closer analysis, I'd need the files' content. >> > Knut, thank you for sending me the files off-list. > I hope thats really ok with you since the list refused my attachment for understandable reasons. > For some reason, there are differences in the memory map for those two > builds. > > h8dmr: > Program Header: > LOAD off 0x00001000 vaddr 0x00200000 paddr 0x00200000 align 2**12 > filesz 0x0002e130 memsz 0x00030b3c flags rwx > LOAD off 0x00030000 vaddr 0x00240000 paddr 0x00240000 align 2**12 > filesz 0x00000000 memsz 0x00018000 flags rw- > STACK off 0x00000000 vaddr 0x00000000 paddr 0x00000000 align 2**2 > filesz 0x00000000 memsz 0x00000000 flags rwx > > h8qme: > Program Header: > LOAD off 0x00001000 vaddr 0x00200000 paddr 0x00200000 align 2**12 > filesz 0x0002d560 memsz 0x00048000 flags rwx > STACK off 0x00000000 vaddr 0x00000000 paddr 0x00000000 align 2**2 > filesz 0x00000000 memsz 0x00000000 flags rwx > > So h8dmr zeroes out a larger chunk of memory - up to 0x258000, while the > h8qme build only loads data up to 0x248000. > > I have absolutely no idea what makes the compiler behave that way on two > practically identical builds, but I have seen that you use the > distribution's compiler - we have no control over the changes they add, > so we created crossgcc at some point. > > Maybe it helps to try to build with crossgcc (you can find that in > util/crossgcc in your coreboot tree) > > > Regards, > Patrick > thx, for the tip, now installing crossgcc.
Thanks, Knut Kujat. -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
