On 02/05/2010 10:07 AM, bifferos wrote:
--- On Fri, 5/2/10, Joseph Smith<[email protected]> wrote:
I don't understand why libpayload is BSD and not GPL? It
just doe not
make very much sense.
It makes perfect sense to me. This allows OEMs to make closed-source
payloads for coreboot, something which may have a positive affect on
Coreboot uptake.
Ok, but I don't see how closed-source can ever be a good thing for
coreboot. Especially when we boast about our code being open-source for
the world to see that it has no security concerns....
To me it sounds like an easy spot for an OEM to slip in what ever they
want...
--
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
