On Fri, February 12, 2010 10:52 am, Myles Watson wrote:
>> > Is this romcc code? If not, maybe it could even be recursive..
>> Not sure, but I know it is very sensitive.  Running printk here reliably
>> crashed coreboot, so the stack may be limited;
>
>
> Have you tried increasing the stack size?  It's too bad not to be able to
> use printk.
>
> Thanks,
> Myles
>

Yes I did.  Actually, at one point I quadrupled it--coreboot crashed in a
different spot, but still crashed.  Removing the printk statement from
that function fixed the crash, even with the quadrupled stack still in
place.

Timothy Pearson
Raptor Engineering


-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to