On 3/1/10 3:57 PM, Patrick Georgi wrote: > It might be a good thing to compare tyan/s2912_fam10 (if that's indeed > the ancestor) and this board, to identify common parts that could be > factored out - we have a live example, with small divergence inbetween. > > Everything we get done now will simplify the job for the next board, as > every feature not to maintain is an issue less for the developer to care > about. > > Any takers? > A great unification would also be to stop having a different target for FAM10 and non-FAM10 boards. This is more complicated for users than a bit of duplicated code. (And it will bite us again for Fam10 + x, and for Nehalem and co, basically for every chipset with a memory controller in the CPU instead of on the board)
So how do we fix our device model, which still assumes a board has exactly one choice of memory controller? Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
