Am 01.03.2010 17:54, schrieb Myles Watson: >>> that checks for RAMBASE < 0xa0000 and eheap > 0xa0000? One large stack >>> could just as easily break this. >> True. Attached patch might do this (only moderately tested) > Acked-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]> Thanks, r5181
>> With those two gone, we could hide RAMBASE somewhere in Kconfig or >> eliminate it completely. > Wasn't there a board with RAMBASE at 32 M too? Might be Rudolf's, to help with suspend/resume. Patrick -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
