On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:14:17 -0700, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > util/x86emu/yabel/vbe.c:647: error: 'vbe_mode_info_t' has no member > >> > named 'framebuffer_address' > >> > make: *** [util/x86emu/yabel/vbe.o] Error 1 > >> > > >> > > >> Appears to be something wrong with the union in structure > vbe_mode_info_t > >> in vbe.c. It points to another structure vesa_mode_info_t, but I am not > >> sure why it is not working????? > >> > > It compiles for me with 5132, but not 5135. You could look at the > changes: > > http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/5135 > > > Yes it appears that union inside of the vbe_mode_info_t structure is new. > Is it even ok to put a union inside of a structure? Yes. It compiles without debug, right?
If I were you I'd comment out the debugging statements that are breaking for you, unless you are trying to debug the vbe code. It looks like framebuffer_address and friends were commented out in 5135. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
