On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]>wrote:
> Am 24.03.2010 22:20, schrieb Stefan Reinauer: > > If they're not runtime patched that'd be a good idea... I think on i945 we >> still patch them up, so const wont work there... >> > We patch up the resulting (ie. copied) ACPI data, or not? So the original > AmlCode can be const > Yep. Abuild tested, so I committed it. I just had to add const to the pointer used for copying multiple SSDTs. Rev 5286. Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
