On 04/11/2010 03:00 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 11.04.2010 20:24, Joseph Smith wrote:
On 04/11/2010 12:09 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
See patch
Could we also add M50FW080 to probe for also?
Some variations have either M50FW040 or M50FW080.
Hm. Since those are flash chips, I think we may want to think about GPIO
reads in flashrom instead. OTOH, GPIO read/write is not a classic
flashrom task at all.
Carl-Daniel,
The only reason we need to probe these is because the IDE cable_detect
pin is connected to a FWH GPI pin. This way we can Boot ATA100 instead
of slow ATA33. Not sure if it is needed in flashrom, but it may make
interesting util?
--
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
