On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:00:26 +0200, Stefan Reinauer
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 09.06.2010, at 12:47, Joseph Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:09:21 +0200, Stefan Reinauer
> <[email protected]
>> >
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/9/10 1:57 AM, Anders Jenbo wrote:
>>>> This patch adds the ECS P6IWP-Fe board to coreboot.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Jenbo <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]>
>>> and checked in as r5623
>>>
>>> But please add a license header to the device tree as well in an
>>> extra
>>> patch..
>>>
>> Yes thanks Anders :-)
>> One more suggestion. I think from this point forward there is really
>> no
>> excuse for any Intel 440bx and up to be using romcc. I feel there
>> should be
>> a new rule, any new boards 440bx and up need to be running CAR for a
>> Ack.
>> Other wise that will be just one more board to back paddle to CAR.
>> Anyone
>> else have a thought on this?
>>
>
> Since people always copy from existing boards and keep changing them
> until it works, a patch that moves all existing 440 boards to CAR
> would most likely solve the problem better than a rule. Want to give
> it a try?
>
I could but not sure how much sense that would make considering I do not
have a 440bx to test....
On the other hand I do have some i810's, That chip I would be glad to
convert :-)
--
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
