On 6/9/10 8:48 PM, Myles Watson wrote: >> > It would need to be 0xe0000 - 0xfffff unless we want to start cutting >> > out more memory. >> > I meant where as in what interrupt to patch, not what address to run > at. SeaBIOS should be able to use whatever address it wants to. > If it contains a dynamic linker, or the code is position independent, yes.
>> > Alternatively we could add an SMI "function call" to coreboot that does >> > the deed. That would simplify the code in SeaBIOS significantly but add >> > more requirements for SMM. >> > I'm not sure what's best. Maybe few enough boards will need their own > handlers that it doesn't really matter. > Kevin, any preference? -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
