On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ward Vandewege <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:59:52AM -0600, Myles Watson wrote: >> It looks like only 5632 has the "ADT7463 properly initialized" >> message. One problem is that patch 2 was meant to be applied after >> patch 1, > > Ah, whoops, I was wondering if I was doing the right thing there... I should have been clearer.
>> so the device didn't end up in the tree for that run. I'll >> have to think about why the only message from the new device with >> patch 1 is "I2C: 00:d0 missing read_resources" For some reason it >> doesn't look like it got the correct ops. >> >> I wonder why the temperature values look right in all cases. Does it >> need to be cold booted in order for the initialization to be needed? > > All boots were cold. OK. Thanks for doing that. I guess I don't know what I'm looking at in the sensors output to see if the device initialization worked. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
