Hi Patrick, Op dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 10:27:00 schreef u: > are you able to test the S50 with a current coreboot checkout with the > RAMBASE option removed? > > I'm asking because you provided the patch at > http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/1485/, but with your other GX2 > changes (moving to CAR), I can't tell if removing RAMBASE is safe now.
Unfortunately i have very little time at the moment but i hope to be able to test it for you next weekend. The RAMBASE removal is still on my to do list. I think you were right that it should be part of the chipset code. After the question (hint?) from Stephan :"Why 1F6BF000 ?" ,i was not sure anymore if the static address was the right thing to do or that it would be necessary/better to calculate the address based on the amount of dram in the system. But i haven`t got around to investigate what it does exactly. Thanks,Nils. -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
