On 18.08.2010, at 15:55, "Masoud Fatollahy" <[email protected]> wrote:
> thanks for the response, > > I have downloaded the latest version of filo from Subversion with > $ svn co > svn://coreboot.org/filo/trunk/filo > > but this version requires the payloadlib of coreboot, it is what i don't want > to use Why? > , is there any other version which doesn't requir coreboot/payload/payloadlib? > Yes but you will have to fix it yourself, as I wrote in the other mail.. > mv.h > > /Masoud > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:06:36 +0200 > Subject: Re: [coreboot] Coreboot and stand alone filo > > On 8/17/10 10:05 PM, Masoud Fatollahy wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to make coreboot v4 works with a old version of filo(stand >> alone). >> >> I build the coreboot and definde a paload which has been build with an old >> filo which is not using payloadlib of the coreboot. >> when filo try to read the linuxbios table , but it can not find the >> signaturr LBIO. and it hangs. >> >> Do i have to use filo and payloadlib of the coreboot, or is it a way to fix >> this problem. we don't want to have any depency between coreboot and filo. >> >> thanks, >> >> /Masoud >> > Hi Masoud, > > The coreboot table parser in older FILOs does not support the "FORWARD" tag > > http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/browser/trunk/payloads/libpayload/arch/i386/coreboot.c#L140 > > > I'd suggest that you use newer versions of FILO. However, implementing > support for that tag in older versions should be rather straight forward, so > you can give that a try, too.. > > Stefan > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
