Scott Duplichan wrote: > At 1600x1200, 16-bit color is almost perfect. But the same > resolution with 32-bit color results in a display that jumps so > much it cannot be read. Why would 32-bit color make a difference?
Twice the bandwidth needed to get the graphics data out of RAM. > I am thinking that refreshing 1600x1200 pixels 60 times per second > takes a lot data, and that data has to cross the HT link. True > color takes more data than high color, and true color may be > exceeding the capacity of the cpu-RS780 link. The link is running > at the slowest possible setting, 200 MHz, 8-bit. Ouch! :\ That would seem to cause the problem. Can't say about HT3 I'm afraid. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
