> Last night, I thought I would just learn about gas macros and do it > that way. It was more difficult than I thought. I cannot even find > examples of gas macros that use arguments. A C style macro seemed > possible, but I found when gas processes it the needed ?: does not > work. So I ended up with a gas macro that does not use arguments. > The macro allows the awkwark logic and additional error checking to > be placed in an existing include file. The new error checking was > tested by forcing a few failing cases: > > > Signed-off-by: Scott Duplichan <[email protected]> I'm sorry that I wasn't more clear. I think it was better before. The code looks exactly the same, but it's in a different file, which wasn't my intent at all.
I like the other version much better. I hope that your new knowledge of gas macros will come in handy in the future :) Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
