On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:00:08PM -0800, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > The sb700_ prefix was introduced in the early v2 tree many years ago > because our old build system "newconfig" could not handle two files with > the same name in different paths like /path/to/usb.c and > /another/path/to/usb.c correctly. Only one of the files would end up > being compiled into the final image. > > Since Kconfig (actually since shortly before we switched to Kconfig) we > don't suffer from that problem anymore. So we could drop the sb700_ > prefix from all those filenames (or, the <componentname>_ prefix in general)
Yup, I like it. I'd do it in small steps though (one SB/NB/superio at a time) otherwise it's probably too much tedious work and will break lots of pending patches etc. Uwe. -- http://hermann-uwe.de | http://sigrok.org http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
