* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> [110105 00:05]: > Still, having the code checked in is IMHO better than having it on the > list. If there are any CIMx integration issues later, we still have the > alternative code (and as a nice benefit, we can actually touch that code > whereas CIMx should be kept unchanged to allow easier updates).
I would prefer to see CIMx integration issues fixed rather than worked around with an in-tree fork for a non-existant user base that might experience problems in the unforseeable future. There is nothing that prevents us from reporting issues with the CIMx code back to AMD to have it fixed. Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
