Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > We know that coreboot support for via hardware suffers from > > copypastitis. Would be good to unify that at some point, but for > > this patch I think the fix should go into the components that are > > affected, so that they don't use what isn't available. > > In this particular case, I think the code is cleaner to ignore calls > to mainboard_interrupt_handlers() when option rom support is not > desired. The northbridge code is telling the option rom code
Neither of which encompass the header file. I think it would be an equally good solution to add the empty function into the code for each northbridge. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
