Am Dienstag, den 18.01.2011, 15:22 +0100 schrieb Mathias Krause: > Well, but after the build the CBFS could still be modified (intentional > or not) in such a way that it would no longer contain a file named > "cmos_layout.bin". So at least to aid debugging it would be nice to see > a warning here instead of wondering why the CMOS layout is missing in > the LB table. I added some reporting in r6269.
> I guess you assume it'll return either 1 (good case) or 0 (bad case) not > -1 - which is the case btw. But you're right. I mixed up the size and > count parameters of the fwrite() call. So you check is fine the way it is. r6270 makes this more explicit for all calls (so return -E* bails out, too). Patrick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
